Image Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lollyknit/417661856/
Using the information in the Week 9 module, use the comments box to post on this topic.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Initellectual Freedom Resources
- ALA's Office of Intellectual Freedom (OIF)
- Banned Books Week
- Censors and Children's Literature
- Censorship: An Educator's Guide
- Chris Crutcher Answers the Censors
- Freedom to Read Foundation
- Judy Blume Talks About Censorship
- NCTE Anti-Censorship Center
- Profane Offensive and Great
- School Library Media Centers and Intellectual Freedom (ALA)
- Thinking About Intellectual Freedom
The book "And Tango Makes Three" has raised the issue of homosexuality. This is a children's book that covers a very adult theme. However when I read the book aloud to my husdand I noticed that there are no "bad" words, violence, or sexual content. The main reason I think for the censorship is the gay theme. Younger students may not even pick up on the gay theme because it does not state "they are gay penguins". I read this book to my husband to see his reaction and it took my husband about half way to realize that the penguins were a couple. I have to admit that it pressed heavy on me that it doesn't matter who you are with as long as your happy. I would like to say that I would carry "And Tango Makes Three" in my library. If parents wanted to challenge the book I would ask on what grounds? As I stated before there is not any curse words, sexual content, or violence in the book. I love the quote by Scales, " Children will put down what they can't handle or what they aren't ready for"
ReplyDeleteThe title of my book is Uncle Bobby’s Wedding. It is a picture book based upon the marriage of homosexual guinea pigs. For the age range, it would probably be located within a primary or elementary school setting. Before reading the articles for this week, I would say that I certainly self-censor. I loved the book, but I was wondering if I should include it in the library seeing as the controversy I’m sure it would cause. For this reason, I had to weigh the possible benefits of the book while also looking at the negative aspects that I’m sure many students and parents would be vocal about. I think this weighing strategy may help media specialist decide whether or not the book will cause more harm than benefit by being included in the library. After weighing my chosen book, I have decided that the benefits outweigh the negative connotations. The book also helps students learn that while love ones may get married, have kids, and move on in their own lives, that doesn’t mean that they forget their friends and other loved ones.
ReplyDeleteI would include S.E. Hinton's "The Outsiders" in my media collection. The most notable reason for this book to be challenged would be because of the violence which is described somewhat graphically in several chapters of the book. Drug and alchohol abuse is a common topic and almost all of the characters from the book are from broken homes. Three characters also die violent and tragic deaths.
ReplyDeleteI think this book should be housed in a school library because although the topics (teen pregnancy, gang culture, societal differences, etc.) may be considered inappropriate, young adults are facing decisions regarding these issues either directly or indirectly. The descriptions of violence in the novel bring the reader to a reality that gangs are not as glamorous as some think.
I believe the positive lessons learned from the book outweigh the criticisms it may face. Because young adults are able to relate to the characters, they are deeply affected by the novel's outcomes.
I chose I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. This book is challenged because of racism, child abuse, and it is sexually explicit. However, don't some children deal with this in their own lives. I would include this title in my media center. I found the articles on self censorship very revealing. I like to think I don't censor, except for my children in the role as their mother (they are seven), but I was wrong. I found myself thinking several of the things the authors wrote about. The only plus to this, is that currently I don't work in a library, and can see and fix what I am doing. In my future choices I will be careful to choose books based on content and pertinence, not on individual worries and prejudices. I have some work to do. I hope I was not the only one?
ReplyDeleteI chose to read "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings." This book has been challenged because of its language, sexual content, for addressing lesbianism and pre-marital sex, and for "bitterness toward whites." I would choose to have this biography as part of my collection. Altough it does address the challenged topics addressed above, the historical accuracy, the richness of the language, and the truth of the experiences of Angelou make this an invaluable resource, especially today and young adults struggle with who they are, why they endure what they do, and living with the choices that they make. Most people who oppose controversial books do so in an attempt to pretend that these issues aren't really happening. We certainly don't want to scare our kids with the books that are available, but we certainly don't want to give them the idea that the world is absolutely safe, nobody is going to hurt you, drugs are just for the rich and famous, all adults have kid's best interest at heart, and nobody is going to have issue with your differences. Books offer a world where we can come to terms with these issues. Harry Potter and Hogwarts isn't real but that book certainly reinforces to me that life is about choosing sides (good/bad) and with the right people around us anything is possible!
ReplyDeleteThe book I chose was Uncle Bobby's Wedding by Sarah S. Brannen which was listed #8 on the 2008 Challenged Book list. I found it difficult to locate the book. I had to order it. Barnes & Nobles in Buford (north of Atlanta)didn't carry it and the public library system only had two copies available in the entire state. I would place this title in my media center. The story is about a little guinea pig girl who is afraid of losing her uncle's attention once he gets married. Same-sex marriage is incidental to the plot. There has been a challenge to this book in Castle Rock, CO. I've provided a link for a blog by Jamie Larue, director of the library there. His letter to the patron challenging the book is very well written.
ReplyDeletehttp://jaslarue.blogspot.com/2008/07/uncle-bobbys-wedding.html
"Library collections don't imply endorsement; they imply access to the many different ideas of our culture, which is precisely our purpose in public life." This quote by Mr. Larue sums it up. I feel I need to consider the literary value of a book to my collection, leave me own personal thoughts aside, age appropriateness, and what appeals to my patrons as to what goes in my media center. Knowing that I have a backup with the reconsideration policy and that all concerns will be heard through this process is the way not to head down that slippery slope of self-censorship.
Using the banned/challenged title that you read this semester, and keeping in mind that as a media specialist your goal is to find reasons to select items for your collection, would you include your title in your media center collection?
ReplyDeleteThe book I reviewed for inclusion in my collection, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hosseini would definitely be included in my collection. The story provides insight into the political and social climate of Kabul, Afghanistan from the mid-1970’s to the present. Some of the story’s themes that make this a valuable addition to the collection include racism, religious fundamentalism, traditional vs. new ways of thinking, guilt and reconciliation, father and son relationships, and friendship. Cultural change and continuity is also significant in the story with reference to the Cold War and Taliban coming to power in Afghanistan.
What issues have been raised about your title?
The book is on one of the ALA’s most challenged list because of a situation where the main character, Amir, allows his friend and son of his father’s servant, Hassan, to be sodomized by bullies. This is probably the only part of the book that contributes to its status as a challenged book. This incident adds to the character and plot development of the book and creates stark differences between the characters, in terms of power and morality.
How, as a media specialist, can you avoid heading down the slippery slope of self-censorship by NOT worrying about whether or not somebody might object to a title?
Having a challenged book policy with a position statement that is based on 1st Amendment rights would be beneficial. Also having a form for concerned teachers or parents to use in order to voice their concerns in writing might help give people a place to voice their concerns. Then the committee could respond according to the protocol described in the policy. This way it would be a unified committee responding according to the position statement, and not a single media specialist acting out of fear or self-preservation.
After reading the banned book, Bridge to Tarabithia, I would include this book in the media collection. I enjoyed reading this book. The issues raised in 2002 for banning this book were occult/Satanism, offensive language, and violence. After reading the book, I found no reference to Satanism or occult beliefs. I did find one questionable word in the book, with no violence, and one death.
ReplyDeleteAs a media specialist, one cannot avoid self-censorship in any form. People self-censor all the time. Being a teacher, I have self-censored for my students, an all boys 6th grade reading class. The book I wanted to read had knights, sword fighting, religious connotations. As a teacher, I was concerned about parent approval and support. When looking back, I should have notified the parents about the book selected along with a brief overview and asked for concerns or comments from the parents.
As a media specialist, ways to address parental concerns or banned book issues would be to have in place a selection policy that covers challenged books in the county. I would also want to have a media committee to assist in developing criteria that would determine book selections.
I read TTYL. The book was not hard to read, but I had stay focused on the who was making the comments. I understand why the book is on the challenged/banned list. There is some language and conversation we want our kids to stay away from. My 16 year old daughter started to reading the book and she could only shake her head. When I first started reading the book she made the statement she didn't want me knowing what acronyms they use. She actually thought the reading was a bit different. I think the book would be better at college age students, not on public school bookshelves. The conversation is something that happens in daily life. I would want to teach young ladies to act and speak as young ladies and leave some things left unsaid. As a parent, I would not want my kid to check this book out. Sometimes we want to think our kids are on the sheltered side of life.
ReplyDeleteFor banned book week I chose the The Kite Runner. There were complex and sometimes controversial topics and themes in this book, including sexual assault, but in the end if I were a high school media specialist I would carry this book. The book discusses historical and political events/issues that take place in Afghanistan, which is current to events taking place in the world today. I can see where there might be concerns with carrying this book, but it could be a truly beneficial tool to use to teach students about different cultures, histories, beliefs, opinions, and perspectives.
ReplyDeleteI have to confess that after reading all of the literature on self-censorship I have been guilty of this in the past as a teacher. I now have a much better understanding of this topic and why it against students' intellectual freedom. Just because a book may raise questions or concerns from parents does not mean that it is right to with hold that material from students.
I would include Toni Morrison's Bluest Eye in my media center, assuming that my media center was a high school. Honestly, just going on the reading level of her stuff, I'd probably avoid it in any other grade. It just doesn't make sense as an expenditure to have a book that very few of the students would be capable of reading. The issues are sexual (including an incestuous rape) and race (one of the main characters wishes she were white because she's always been told she was ugly because of her darker skin). Some of the scenes in the book are fairly disturbing, but I don't think anything in this book is too much for a high school aged student and it's not like it's glorifying any of these issues.
ReplyDeleteSelf-censorship is a tough issue, though. I'm not sure exactly where the line between unnecessary censorship and right and wrong is. I'm pretty sure there's a line that we all agree would be inappropriate at a certain age. But on most controversial titles, I'd say the main thing to keep in mind is whether or not you're keeping it out of your collection because it doesn't add anything to the collection or if it's just because you're worried about complaints or your personal values. I think keeping that in mind could help, but I don't see this as an easy situation at all.
The challenged book I chose to read for this assignment was Twisted by Laurie Halse Anderson. I think this book is age appropriate for young adults and would include it in my middle/high school media center. There is a note before the first chapter that clearly states this is not a book for children. I would heed that warning and not include this book in an elementary school media center. Twisted, as well as other books by Halse Anderson, have been challenged for sexual content and language. I like that the protagonist is realistic and relatable. The main character is also a male, which is one reason why I chose the book. I thought I would find him morally corrupt and weasle-like. I am happy to be wrong. Tyler is a troubled teen from a dysfunctional family struggling through adolescence. I found myself empathizing with the character and celebrating his victories, no matter how small.
ReplyDeleteSince I am not actively in a media center I can't imagine the stress of having to please everyone at once and keep the interest of the students on the top of your list. I believe the best way to protect yourself and collection, as well as protecting the rights of your students, would be to have an extinsive and concise collection and review policy that protects the materials in the media center.
I was very interested to read “And Tango Makes Three” when I saw that it has been on the challenged books list for several years in a row. I was very shocked when I actually read the book. It is obvious that the book has a gay theme, and I just do not believe that it is appropriate for the intended audience. According to the School Library Journal, this book is intended for students in Pre-K through 3rd grade. I teach first graders, and I do not want my students reading books with this type of content. I realize that many people will say that I am being narrow-minded and too conservative, but I feel that I need to stand for what I believe. Children should not have to deal with or be exposed to deep issues at such a young age. Another reason that I would not put this book in my media center is because it does not support the curriculum in any way. According to Whelan, a media specialist should choose titles that best suit the curriculum and meet the reading needs of students, which involves making judgment calls. My call on this book is that it is not appropriate and should not be in an elementary school library.
ReplyDeleteThe book I am reading is "Fat Kid Rules The World". This banned book is about a child who is rescured from a suicide attempt from a "homeless" person.
ReplyDeleteThe book addressing "overweight" status, which is something many of us struggle with even in adulthood.
It also addresses "suicide". Suicide is the leading death among teens.
This is why I think the book should be included on the school library shelves. It is a delicate issue that addresses the reasons that infuence teens to consider suicde.
Many do not believe that suicide is acceptable practice among most religious cirlces.
It impacts the life of many, usually most detrimentally parents and siblings.
It seems easier to "self censor" but I would not censor materails and rely on policies and procedures for selections, ensuring they had the strength of a board attorney and supportive principal and/or media director to make these related resources about real life issues available. These resources teach "life lessons" about struggles and dealing with struggles that are key to survivalship.
Victoria
I chose "King and King" by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland. This book has been challenged because of the homosexual content. I would not include this book in my media center collection. The book is written for Preschool-grade 3. The topic of homosexuality is one that I believe shouldn't be discussed with a child who is in this age bracket.There are just some topics that need to be handled and discussed when a child is a little bit older. The book also has nothing to do with our curriculum.
ReplyDeleteThe book that I chose to read this semester, “And Tango Makes Three” is a book that involves two male penguins that live in a zoo that choose to stay together rather than mate with females. They are given an egg by a zoo keeper from another penguin couple to raise. They call the baby penguin Tango and live happily every after. The book could insinuate homosexuality for some. I don't think a primary student would understand this but I think upper elementary students would definitely catch on. Nowhere in the book does it mention sexuality nor has inappropriate language for this age group. As a media specialist, I still don't think I would put it in the library. I think parents should decide when their children are exposed to topics such as this. A school library is not very large, so there will be many books that can't be purchased so I think one should choose the best, most entertaining, and educational books out there. I don't feel that this book would add anything in particular to the collection nor does the book bring any educational content.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be very difficult not to worry about someone objecting to a challenged book. A media specialist should have a descriptive selection policy that addresses challenging books that the administration backs up.
As a media specialist, I would include And Tango Makes Three in my collection. There are many students at my current school being raised by same-sex parents. I see this book as a necessary resource for those students. This book has been challenged as offensive to parents who are trying to shelter their children from immoral behavior. North Kansas City Schools Board of Education recently voted to keep the book on the shelves. However, the school system now allows K-12 parents online access to the school’s card catalog and the ability to restrict their children’s reading material. To avoid worrying about objections to my selections, I would maintain and follow current selection and reselection policies.
ReplyDeleteI have chosen the book "Flashcards of My Life" and I would think it would not be a particularly bad book for a different age group. The book states it is geared towards 9-12 year old kids. The book deals with a young girl and her issues with friends, family, and her body. I would think that this book would be more age appropriate if it was listed as a book for ages 13 and up. It makes specific reference to her body and how she is not particularly happy with certain parts of it. The book does deal with real life issues that girls go through and I don't think it is on that should be banned. It just needs to be censored in a manner that kids under a certain age should not be able to check it out. I would keep this book in my Media Center but I would try to discourage students under the age of 12 from checking it out without parental permission. I have enjoyed the book but I don't plan on letting my 10 year old read it. It is not a book that should be banned but rather used for a more mature age group.
ReplyDeleteI would allow the book "Taming the Star Runner" by S.E. Hinton to be available in the media center in which I will work. This book was banned because of topics such as violence and language. Travis, the main character, finds himself living with his uncle because he turns violently against his father. He goes to work on the ranch and tries to get his book published. He has many hardships that he faces. I feel that this book relates to the problems of the students today because so many of them are coming from broken homes as well and face many problems. The outcome of the book teaches the students to not give up and do not give in to temptations. This lesson I feel outweighs the reasons for it to be banned.
ReplyDeleteThe book I read was "Annie's baby: the diary of anonymous, a pregnant teenager" by Beatrice Sparks. Annie is a 14 year old in love with a boy that she desperately tries to please. She lies to her mother to go to drinking parties, struggles with decisions about premarital sex, is abused and raped by her boyfriend, and considers abortion when she becomes pregnant. I’ve seen many girls become obsessed with guys as Annie does, but Annie also subjects herself to physical as well as emotional violence. To me this is a case of when the benefit to many would outweigh the disapproval of some. I think that this is always a challenge when selecting books for a middle school because students vary so widely in their experiences, maturity and needs. It’s also difficult to trust the age recommendations in reviews because they vary. We have some books I consider romance novels with sex scenes equivalent to soft porn. I disagree with Scales statement “Children will put down what they can’t handle or what they aren’t ready for.” (ex: Playboy) I think popularity and value must be weighed and that’s a tough, time consuming job in middle school.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSalinger's Catcher in the Rye was my chosen book and I would most definitely include it in my middle school/high school collection. Holden Caulfield, the main character, is an incredible literary figure who offers insight into the constant turmoil that the majority of teenagers face. Though set in 1950's New York, I believe most adolescents would relate to Holden's cynicism, crass language, and worries about the opposite sex. I found the offensive language and sexual content as reasons for banishment superficial at best. Yes, the use of "goddamn" multiple times becomes redundant, but it lends to the authenticity of Salinger's character and writing. Holden Caulfield holds up a mirror to societies phoniness, hypocrisy and passiveness, and I believe that is what a majority of people find uncomfortable.
ReplyDeleteWith firm knowledge of the 1st Amendment, Library Bill of Rights, and a committed media selection committee and policy behind me, I'd hope I would stand fearless when including a vital book like Catcher in the Rye.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI read "The Kite Runner" by Khaled Hosseini. I would include it in a high school collection but not a middle school collection. The book contains so much information about Afghanistan and the changes in that country over the years that it is relevant to current political issues. I also think that reading about a person's struggle to rebuild a life in a different country would qualify as presenting a variety of viewpoints on a topic. The book may cause students to think about consequences of actions and having to live with guilt and regret.
ReplyDeleteThe issues raised about the book include age-appropriateness, sexually explicit scenes, and offensive language. I have concerns about these same issues after reading the book, but all of the reviews are positive. I definitely want to have a good selection policy in place, and I plan to use quality reviews to make good selection and weeding decisions. I'm sure that I will worry about challenges, but I hope to avoid self-censorship by remembering my responsibility to the students and the support that I have in the Library Bill of Rights and the 1st Amendment.
I have been listening to The Perks of Being a Wallflower. I'm not finished yet, but I really like it so far. After hearing the narrator, Charlie, talk about The Smiths so much I had to look them up. I went to YouTube and found a video of Asleep and several people there had made comments about how "Charlie sent them." That's powerful to me and says a lot about the effect the book has on readers. There is a lot of discussion about sex, but I think it is done in a very thoughtful manner. I would definitely purchase the book for high school, but am still the debating middle school purchase.
ReplyDeleteYes, I would include THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER by Stephen Chbosky in my high school media collection despite the fact that a number of issues have been raised about this title. Those issues include teen drug use, sex, abortion, suicide, and homosexuality. It also deals very thoughtfully with dysfunctional families, molestation, love of family and great friendship.
ReplyDeleteThe book takes place over the course of Charlie's first year in high school. He struggles with so much but is a sensitive, caring young man who is kind to others and loves his family. The way the book is presented (all letters that Charlie writes to "Dear friend") is touching and realistic.
Although some people would not want their students or children to read a book which touches on the subjects, the fact is, teens often do have to deal with these issues. If they don't themselves, then they have friends or acquaintances who do.
As a media specialist, at least one who attempts to uphold the ethics of the profession, there is always the possibility that a title will be challenged. Even so, we must follow our school and district's selection policy and take into consideration titles in which students show interest. Shying away from a book because someone MIGHT challenge it "annihilates two of the reader's basic bill of rights: - the right to read anything
- the right not to defend our tastes"
(Comer, p. 3)
We can't worry about everything that might be challenged and ethically, properly do our job.
The book I am reading is "Bridge to Terabithia". The issues of why it was challenged several years ago is because of the occult/Satanism references and offensive language. I haven't finished reading it yet, but I can share what I have encountered so far. In just the 2nd chapter of the book, there was some profanity..."hellhole, damn, and bitched". I haven't gotten far enough yet to see if there are any references to the occult (I'm only on chapter 5). If I went by what I've read so far, I wouldn't have any problem using this book in my 5th grade novel studies nor would I have a problem with it being in my collection in the MC as a MS. At the beginning of the school year, I always have a discussion with my students about the types of novels we'll be using through the year for our studies and what they will encounter in them. I have never sent a letter home to parents to "warn" them. I have tried to let the students decide for themselves if a novel is too much for them to handle. So far, I have never had any complaints and the students are usually mature enough to handle the language. I always tell my students that if they are offended in any way and feel like they cannot read a novel, to see me privately to discuss it. I let the student make that choice. I try to choose quality children's lit that also fits the needs for my students concerning the standards. I have to ask myself which novels can teach these particular standards in a way that is enjoyable and most effectively.
ReplyDeleteI want to make sure I have a good selection policy in place and would like the media committee to develop it with me to reduce the possibility of bias, so it's not just my thoughts. It's important to use the reviews and curriculum to make sound choices.
I’m afraid that I would not include the book “The Fashion Disaster that Changed My Life” by Lauren Myracle in my middle school collection. Although this book was reviewed as being appropriate for children as young as fourth grade (SLJ), it has been challenged for “offensive language,” “sexually explicit content” and being “unsuited to age group.” While the story seems innocent, some of the references are graphic and inappropriate. In one scene there is a discussion about condoms and whether their parents use them. In another scene, after the group of girls find one of their mother’s Playgirl magazines, they take turns shouting “honey-roasted penis”. As a media specialist in a charter school that emphasizes character education and proper etiquette, I feel this kind of book would be inappropriate for our collection. However, I would probably include it in a high school collection. I also read about half of another one of Lauren Myracle’s books, “Luv Ya Bunches,” recommended for grades 3-6 (SLJ). This material appears to be much more age appropriate and I would be more likely to include this title in my collection.
ReplyDeleteI did consider the Library Bill of Rights when deciding whether to include this book in a middle school collection. While I do feel students have a right to read anything they choose, I also feel the books in a school library should be suited for the age group attending the school.
I chose The Chocolate War to read. I understand how students relate to this book-the idea that the popular students bully the remaining students at school into doing things they don't want to do. However, I believe this meaningful theme is hidden behind sexual innuendo and vulgar language that are not necessary to the plot. For example, in the first chapter of the book the author writes, "…like seeking ecstasy's memory an instant after jacking off and encountering only shame and guilt." This is to describe a play on the football field. Is this simile really necessary? I think not. This is only one of many male masturbation references in the novel. I understand the author is trying to make the novel "real," but can't things get "too real" for students. The language and sexual scenes are the reason for this novel's challenge. I must admit I am torn on this issue…while I know as a media specialist I have to promote intellectual freedom, I also believe as an educator it is my responsibility to produce responsible citizens. Books that include violence, crude language, and sexually inappropriate scenes as appropriate happenings are not the way to produce such citizens. Therefore, I would not just “pick” this book to be in my library.
ReplyDeleteI feel I have the duty to include my title, Pinkerton, Behave in my media center collection. The issues that have been raised about my challenged book are that it exposes children to violence and can cause fear at home because of a burglary in the story. To try and avoid censorship I will try and think of those children that need to hear the questionable stories, so they can relate and not feel alone if they have experienced a similar tragic event. I will also remind myself of our duty as media specialists which is to expose children to all types of literature and remind myself of the policy that is in place to protect media specialists.
ReplyDeleteMy book of choice was “Crazy Lady!” The story is about a teenage boy struggling in school, Maxine the neighborhood alcoholic and her son Ronald who is mentally retarded. All of these things are found in the real world. While reading the book, I also discovered that there are some cuss words also included. When reading it aloud to the class I skipped the choice words but had great discussion about other aspects of the book. As a media specialist, if I knew about the book and saw that a student wanted to check it out, I would probably try to call the parents and just let them know what was in the book. I would appreciate this courtesy as a parent and feel that is the best way to handle the situation. I am not sure that every media specialist knows about every book that is in his/her collection. I would not try to censor the book, but at least make the parents aware of what the book contains. This would be a great opportunity to talk to the students about subjects that don’t always get discussed. Once you let the parent know then it is their call about whether they want their child to read it or not.
ReplyDeleteAnd Tango Makes Three by Justin Richardson, Peter Parnell, Henry Cole (Illustrator)was the title book I chose that focused on the issue of homosexuality. Although it does discuss this topic, there is no profanity, sexual content, etc. even in the book. I think the book should be on shelves and available for checkout. Children are so much more advanced and have so much more knowledge on the topic than I think most give them credit for. By having this book available, they can begin to learn at a young age about different sexuality preferences.
ReplyDeleteThe Perks of Being a Wallflower by Chbosky has been challenged due to homosexuality, sexual references etc. Despite this, I would include the title in a high school media center. I feel it is our job to be “inclusive” rather than “exclusive” as students identify strongly with books that reflect their own fears, concerns and curiosities. We all come from differing cultures, religious backgrounds, etc… and to deny any student the access to literature that offers a reflection of their experiences simply because of the potential of another student’s or parent’s objection, we are supporting discrimination and censorship.
ReplyDeleteI feel choosing titles based on professional reviews and selecting materials that serve all students in the school are the best methods in avoiding self-censorship. On a personal note, I tend to reflect upon my own experiences as a teen. My mother was a very conservative Christian and with good intentions tried to “screen” my readings as a teen. As a daughter, I understood. However, as an individual, I was offended. I felt she didn’t trust me or the values she instilled within me. We underestimate the ability of our teens to preserve their individual beliefs and values while reading controversial material.
After reading the articles for this week's topic, I thought hard about self- censorship. I had never thought about censorship out of fear of complaints, however, I think it happens all the time. I think the importance of novels that deal with the tough topics are so valuable to students. The titles that come into question so often are the ones that deal with the topics that teens are usually unwilling to discuss with parents or peers or anyone. To be able to go to the MC and find books that could lead students to make healthy, mature choices is invaluable to our society. My title is Twisted. I would definately include the title in my MC. The objections are that it is not age appropriate, discusses drugs and alcohol, deals with sexual issues, and mature conflicts. The novel is from a male's perspective and deals with how he mature's and his thought process. It could help show teens how to make healthy choices and think through major issues. I think to avoid self censorship I must think about the students and not about the possible critics. I think if you keep in mind the benefits to the students it should be obvious if a book should be included. I am very liberal socially, so I can see how my purchases compared to a more conservative belief system might be different, I do not know the answer to that, for me personally, I think I could avoid self censorship.
ReplyDeleteI chose "The Golden Compass" because of it's challenge to my own beliefs. I do believe that I wanted to challenge myself to see if I would be able to keep myself from self censoring the book without actually finishing it. I have to admit that I had to keep in mind that it was a work of fiction and while the religious elements were in oppostion to my own beliefs that everyone had a right to his/her own beliefs. I think I could aviod censorship in my own media center (when I have one) because I believe that everyone should be able to have their own beliefs, even if they go against my own. I do think that many parents might have a problem with this title being included one the shelves and while I may agree that it could be confusing for younger readers I don't think that it should be removed from older students choices.
ReplyDeleteMy Selected Title: The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini
ReplyDeleteI would most definitely select this book for our media center’s collection. With recent events in the Middle East, many students may have interest in reading a story which takes place in Afghanistan. This selection received some complaints from parents for its brief but shocking telling of an adolescent raped by a neighborhood bully. I could understand how an unsuspecting elementary librarian could easily misinterpret the tile and cover illustration to mean that the story is an innocent tale of two childhood friends growing up in Afghanistan. In my opinion, this book is suitable for students who understand that the world is full of people who harm others, sometimes in terrible ways such as rape. Therefore, I would have no reservations adding this book to a middle or high school collection.
Tyler Torek
The book that I read was gossip girl. In considering whether or not I would allow the banned book that I read to be placed in a library collection I would have to say that I would. However, the book would only be in a high school library. The material and language I feel is too mature for students at the elementary and middle grades levels. The book has a lot of curse words in it and it covers topics of drug use, underage drinking, sex, and partying. While I may not agree with the behavior of the characters in the book, the issues they face are in some ways the same types of issues that high school students today are faced with. Many teenagers watch the show gossip girl which is a very popular television show that is based on the book series. If the teens are watching and liking the show why not provide the books for them to read?! The content may not suit my fancy but it may encourage some teens to pick up a book and read.
ReplyDeleteThe challenged book that I decided to read is I Hadn’t Meant to Tell You This by Jacqueline Woodson. Issues have been raised about this particular book because it deals with child sexual abuse and abandonment. Yes, I would include this book in my collection because I really think that it will help young adolescents that have been victims of sexual abuse and abandonment cope with their situation.
ReplyDeleteI do not plan on heading down a slippery slope of self-censorship because my obligation is to the students. My goal is to select books that are of interest them. I believe strongly that students should be able to read whatever they want to read and I would not deny them that right. Some of things that parents seem to worry about in books are the same things that their children are watching on television each day. Are they going to challenge the programs on television as well? So I don’t plan on worrying about the items in the collection being challenged as long as there is a concrete plan for handing challenged items.
I have been reading Lauren Myracle's book, ttfn , for my banned book title. First of all, the layout or the design of the book, in which the pages look like a computer screen with text language, is very compelling and I know for a fact that it would attract the attention of my 2nd-5th grade students. However, I would definitely not include this book in my elementary school due to its bad language. I would not be so much worried about what the parents thought about it...I would be more worried about what the students would be learning from it. Yes, there are a few books in our library that have some bad language in them, but I doubt there are any with the same level as this particular book.
ReplyDeleteI think a key thing to remember about our selection practices is that the student's needs come first. Our students NEED to learn to become lifelong readers and it's our jobs to help them become these types of readers. However, I do feel that we can be selective in our purchases to a certain extent. Why else do people write reviews of books? Why do we read reviews of books even when we are purchasing a book for ourselves?
After reading all of the articles for this discussion, I have one thought that I can't stop thinking about. Robert Cormier, the author of The Chocolate War talked about not including a certain chapter in his book because he didn't want his daughter to read it...
I am a parent before I am a media specialist. I would never want to expose another child to something that I wouldn't want my child exposed to.
The banned book that I read is "The Chocolate War"by Robert Cormier. The story used profanity loosely with violent overtones. In what instance early during Chapter , one character in the book gave reference to Jesus as a guy who walked the Earth, but just received a lot of pr. Also it gave a small referral to self sexual gratification.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't recommend this book being anywhere under a high school level library, on a special collection shelf. The author did use a creative approach to connect to adolescence problems through using the chocolate sales as a driving force behind the cruelty and outcasting in the school environment.
I am somewhat opposed to self censorship. When we start practicing this it becomes an opinioninated decision. This in turn erodes away at the bylaws that this country is based upon. Thus fore you began eating away at the core of literature. This practice would end up causing many good pieces of literature to be overlooked or lost in the shuffle.
I chose to read “The Earth, My Butt, and Other Big Round Things” by Carolyn Mackler. This book was challenged in 2006 for anti-family, offensive language, sexually explicit, and unsuited to age group. The School Library Journal places this book on the reading level of grades 7-10. I could not find this book anywhere around me so I had to order it and I was surprised when I opened the package up to find that it was the winner of the Michael L. Printz Award through the American Library Association. Obviously someone found something special about this book. I would include the book in the media center. I feel that if I did not include this title I would be exhibiting self-censorship. From reading the book I can see that there are areas in the book that would not be appropriate for sixth graders. As far as the anti-family portion of the challenge I feel that many students go through the things that Virginia experiences in this book. Virginia has parents that are over involved in their careers and do not spend enough quality time with their child. Although this book contains some issues that may be too detailed for younger readers I feel that many upper middle school and high school students might learn from the book. I have learned from this class that I must look beyond my own opinion to find what is best for the media center and the students of the school. I feel that having a committee would help in the decision making process when the media specialist is worried about self-censorship.
ReplyDeleteI chose the book "Perks of Being a Wallflower". This book is controversal on many levels. It reminded me a lot of the book "13 Reasons Why". This is based on a personal perspective of a teenage boy's coming of age. It contains language, sex, violence, drugs, and many other things. I am not sure if I would personally want this on my shelf. I talked with my younger sister who is a teen and has read the book. She loved it and thought it was a really moving book. So, if a teen enjoys these types of books should we make them avaliable? I feel like the person in the closet about censorship. Even with unimportant things, I tend to stay on the safe side. I would like to try an experiment with a group of students. Just four or five kids, with parental-consent, that read books and determine what they think of the controversy. As parents do we see through rose colored glasses? Many of the things that are controversal, kids are seeing in real life. In ways, books that contain these issues, help kids deal and cope with the reality around them.
ReplyDeleteBanned Book: It's Perfectly Normal
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the two articles I started to question whether or not I would include this book. When I first picked it up from the bookstore I saw nothing wrong with it. Granted some of the illustrations were a bit racy but not really anymore shocking than a health book, looking in the mirror, or getting changed in the PE locker room. I think it has really great content that students need to know about. Especially now a days when sex ed is limited to one or two days a year.
However, after reading the first article “A Dirty Little Secret” I had to stop and question the book again. Towards the end of the article Scales states “…that governments can’t censor materials unless they’re obscene, [contain] child pornography, or are harmful to minors.” Well there are pictures of naked children in this book, so is it considered child pornography? Maybe in that definition, but it still seems that they are depicted naked for a health education purpose. So I would include the book because it is educational, beneficial to students, and is not obscene in the since that it is just drawings of human anatomy.
The title of my book is Athletic Shorts by Chris Crutcher. It has been challenged in several states. Among these are Texas in 2003, Alaska in 1999, and Alabama in 2001. The concerns raised were because the book contained profanity, discussion about gay sex and AIDS, as well as racist terms for black people.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the book and considering the allegations that have been made, I do understand the concerns. There is quite a bit of foul language and explicit discussion about sex, homosexuality, and racism. However, when it comes to the censorship of this book in a media center, I feel that the book does belong in a middle school or a high school media center but not an elementary media center. I feel that elementary aged students would not be mature enough to understand the context of the stories within this book. However, it is my belief that many middle and high schoolers could relate to much of the materials. I believe that it is my responsibility to choose a vast array of materials for my media center and let the parents be the ultimate censors of what the children read.
Do you think that we as school librarians should act "in loco parentis" with regard to the materials we make available to students?
ReplyDeleteYes, I would include The Golden Compass and the trilogy it is a part of (His Dark Materials) in my media center collection, even though it challenges my beliefs and values.
ReplyDeleteSome issues raised in a booklet called: THE GOLDEN COMPASS: AGENDA UNMASKED, by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights are: 1. The books are marketed to children but are secretly aimed at undermining Christian belief, 2. It is atheist propaganda, 3. It is deceptive to call it a harmless children's story when it is about “killing God”, 4. The author is one of the most outspoken atheists, 5. The author says he is of the devil’s party, 6. The author believes the idea of God should be abandoned and humans should focus on creating a secular humanistic utopia on earth.
As a media specialist, I can simply abide by the standards of the ALA to avoid heading down the slippery slope of self-censorship. More specifically, the ALA has the library Bill of Rights which can help me to NOT worry about whether or not somebody might object to a title.
According to the Library Bill of Rights: “Materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation.” Also: “Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues.” (Scales, p. ix)
In reading the book over again, I cannot see why this book has come under so much scrutiny. Yes, there is some profanity in the book, as in the conversations between Jesse and his father, and in May Belle’s conversation with Leslie about God damming people to hell. All of the “offensive” language used in the book is mild compare to the language I hear on a daily basis with my fifth grade students. As for the idea of death being an inappropriate subject for children, I disagree. Just a couple of years ago we had a young student die in an accident, and currently there is a school staff member who is terminally ill with cancer, so death is at the doorsteps of our students again. I can somewhat sympathize with the play on Greek and Roman mythology in Jesse and Leslie’s excursions, however for me the land of make believe and children go hand in hand.
ReplyDeleteYes! I would have this book on the shelf of my library. As for the self-censorship aspect, I feel that when you research your titles you have a better understanding and can make more informed decisions. I now have a better understanding and appreciation for Katherine Pattern and this book title.
Hello. My name is Candi Partridge. I am a student in Dr. Repman's FRIT 7134 class. This is my fourth semester in the Instructional Technology program. I will conclude my degree in December. I am a Special Education teacher and teach third and fourth graders math and reading. The banned book I chose was I chose Lord of the Flies by William Golding. I remember reading this book in high school thinking it may have been inappropriate then but, as I've gotten older, I really see how it shouldn't be presented in the high school classroom, much less the middle or elementary school media center. The violence the book presents, along with the derogatory comments and racism, go against my definition of appropriate for the classroom.
ReplyDeleteI am reading the book TTYL and has been said to have offensive language, using sexually explicit examples, and unsuited for the age group that it is marked it too. Students today know more offensive language than I ever thought about knowing at their age. I think that it is marketed toward 13-17 year olds, it is far from that. Teenage girls today are exposed to so much more than they were 10 or 20 years ago before the age of 12. As sad as it might seem, I probably would want to put the book in the library. However, if restricted shelves weren't against the law, then I would restrict it for 8th grade female girls.
ReplyDeleteAs far as self-censorship, if a librarian is fully educated on the types of materials that books are addressing and realize that children mature much faster than they once have then it should be okay. Librarians have to sometimes stop and think about the idea of the book from a parent’s view and not just from possible worrying views of a librarian. One way to make parent knowledgeable of the materials in the library would be to invite them for tour.
I read "Flashcards of My Life" by Charise Mericle Harper. This is a YA novel that has been challenged for references to a lesbian character and for content too mature for the intended audience (one of the main characters confronts an older sister who may have been having sex with a boyfriend. This scene was not graphic). The reference to a lesbian character was only 2 paragraphs of text. This seemed like such a minor amount of text and does not warrant a book challenge. The main characters were in 7th grade and I thought the author did an excellent job of dealing with issues that middle schoolers commonly face, such as friendship, fitting in, gossipy girls, parents, self-doubt, etc. I plan on putting this in my classroom library and I would definitely include this in a middle school media center.
ReplyDeleteIt is not the media specialist's job to select books with their personal bias. They need to select materials that fit the needs of the specific collection in their media center, purchase items that teachers request, and select materials that fit the needs of the unique student population at their school. If students are asking for certain books, it is because they are not on the shelves. If the requested book is age-appropriate, has been positively reviewed by a reliable source, and fits within the school system's selection criteria, it deserves to be on the shelf. It doesn't matter if a student's nosy neighbor does not approve of what they are reading. The selection policy and challenged book policy are the media specialist's tools.
I chose Gossip Girl by Cecily Van Ziegesar. This book is about teenagers that drink constantly, do multiple drugs, have endless amounts of money, and never mind discussing their sex life. I admit that as a reader you easily get drawn into this world of manipulation and drama. I am extremely conservative, but also in reality about what teenagers are doing in this day and time. Even though this book has alot of glamour and glitz, many of the same situations occur every weekend in high school settings across the country. I am horrified at the lack of morals and disregard for other people. Would I include this book in the media center? Honestly, I would not. Putting my personal feelings aside is a real challange when drugs appear to be the norm and Ziegesar portrays sex even unprotected sex as something with no real consequences. I do not think it should be on the shelf.
ReplyDeleteI don't think a media specialist should choose books with her own bias at the forefront. I do believe that the media specialist has to consider all age groups, parents, and how the book will better her collection. There should be a media committee in place to discuss any books that might initiate a problem. Policies are critical in the media center and the media specialist should abide by the policies set for by that school system.
I chose to read Maurice Sendak’s Night in the Kitchen. This is a delightful story. As a media specialists I would include this in my media collection. The issue that is raised is one of nudity. One of the illustrations shows the little boy dancing nude in the kitchen with the chefs. As a media specialist I would avoid heading down the slippery slope of self-censorship first by keeping Richmond County’s selection policy in mind. It gives six criteria to consider when making selection. The two points that speak to me the most are numbers four and six”
ReplyDeleteProviding materials on opposing sides of controversial issues so students may develop, under guidance, the practice of critical reading and thinking.
Placing principle above personal opinion and reason above prejudice in the selection of materials of the highest quality in order to assure a comprehensive collection appropriate for the users of the media center.
To some degree, media specialists should act “in loco parentis”. However, I think we have to be very careful with how far we take it. Parents are individuals and each one has their own beliefs and values that may be in direct conflict with those of other parents. For example, one parent may not wish his/her child to read books about suicide as they may feel it is too depressing or irrelevant. However, another parent may have a son or daughter who has attempted to take their own life and may find benefits in having their child identify with a character who has overcome suicidal tendencies. Also, we must consider that when we act “in loco parentis”, we may be identifying with the values/beliefs we hold as a parent and transfer our own biases, cultural/religious preferences on to our selections.
ReplyDeleteThere are too many variables in terms of culture, religion, gender bias, etc… for us to effectively base our selections solely on what we feel parents would select. Therefore, I feel we should act “in loco parentis” in terms of identifying/rejecting materials which are obscene or age/intellectually inappropriate. Yet, we must also focus our efforts on serving the interests and needs of all students as individuals.
The book I read, Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson, was good, although I was not as impressed with it as with some other challenged materials I have read. I think the story of the children's unlikely friendship blossoming as a "secret" world unfolds in the wood behind their homes is a fun idea. It was very creative. Although I can see the "occultism" elements that are included, they are definitely presented more as a child's imagination coming to life. There are a few bad words that are in the book, but my version (borrowed from a teacher) had most of the words whited out and replaced with more acceptable words. The discussions that the students in the book had about their beliefs could cause problems for many, but I believe that it would be a great way to spark discussion. To avoid that slippery slope of self-censorship, I think that I would view books that present ways of thinking that contradict my own as opportunities of discussion. I would definitely include the book in my collection and would love to discuss it with any student that would choose to. I would like to have books that may be objectionable to some students/ parents available to all, but some type of disclaimer on the cover or accounts tagged in the computer if parents have some preference as to types of books that students might not be allowed to check out.
ReplyDeleteThe title that I've been recently following with our focus on banned books is The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. I would include the title in my collection because it's a required reading for ELA. However, it would depend on the demographics of the school too. For example, with the current school that I work at the demographics is 98 percent African American. I most likely would not include this book because I would definitly have upset parents. The issues that have been raised about my title is the racism that is prevelent in the book and the use of the "N" word. I think I can avoid this issue by just being aware of what type of parents that I have that supports the school. That would be one of my main focuses when choosing to decide to have this book in my collection.
ReplyDeleteI chose to read The Golden Compass for my banned title. As a media specialist, I would include the title in the media center collection. The main issue surrounding the controversy is that the novel is based on anti-religious themes. The author is an outspoken atheist and has stated that the books he wrote are about killing God. He despised the Chronicles of Narnia and wanted to write a series of books that showed the other side. He wants children to be drawn into the books like the Harry Potter series.
ReplyDeleteShannon Petty
I am reading “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”… Wow! What a book. As a media specialist, I would choose to place this title in a high school media center rather than a middle school media center. The content is not censored enough to be included in a middle school book. This book has been changed many times for the topic of homosexuality as well as teenage sex. The book mentions the use of drugs many times as well. Moreover, the book speaks about abortion. All these topics are topics that many high school students are facing today. However, I believe I would opt to go with the more censored version( if there were such a thing) of the book ..I feel that the topics can be addressed in a cleaner manner. So yes, the topics need to be discussed, however, it’s the delivery that makes the difference.
ReplyDeleteI would include my title in my media center collection. However, I may have to put it on a restricted shelf due to the profanity, violence, and degrading topics. I would prefer, as the media specialist, for parents to have an opportunity to review the book and give permission for their child to read the book. Some issues that have been raised about my title are the demoralizing comments that implies man and animals are equal, excessive violence, inappropriate language, racism, and comments that degrade minorities, women, the disabled, and God. The symbolism in the book would be a great topic/skill for high school literature teachers to incorporate with the reading of the book. It allows students to reflect on issues that could be or have already been similar, real life experiences. As a media specialist, I feel it would be appropriate to offer the parents access to the material prior to allowing students access. Also, putting the “ify” books on the restricted shelf and requiring parental permission for student access, somewhat avoids the self-censorship and still makes the selection available for students.
ReplyDeleteI read the Captain Underpants books. There is a whole series of books that are written in a comic book style but not really a graphic novel.I believe the only reason the books were banned is that the principal becomes Captain Underpants and is semi-under the influence of two boys who are usually in trouble. The principal changes from his suit into underwear and a red cape and believes he can save the world or maybe just his school. He fights evil lunchroom ladies in one book, and custodians in another. Animation comes in by way of flip pages with instructions of where to place your hands and fingers to see the animation. The books are so outrageous that they are just funny and not in any way offensive because the characters in each of the books is in no way recognizable as a real human being.
ReplyDeleteI believe that students should be allowed to read the books and I have kids as young as second grade who can't wait to check it out. At my school the books are on our Destiny Quest page as the most checked out book in the collection. I have seen no adverse affects from reading about Captain Underpants and kids are reading other books also because everyone from second grade up check out two books at a time.
I would certainly include Morning Girl in my media collection. It provides an alternate viewpoint that is directly related to something that all students study in history class- Christopher Colombus' arrival in the New World. It is told from the point of view of two children in the Bahamas.
ReplyDeleteThe problem most people have with this book is the author, who was accused of child abuse and later committed suicide. His death was over 10 years ago, so his books might not be so controversial now, since he is no longer in the news.
I think the book itself is more important than the author. Most readers don't bother to research an author before they read a book, so I don't think that should keep a book from being on the shelves. Because this book provides a multi-cultural perspective, it would be an excellent addition to any media center.
Dana Roberts
ReplyDeleteI choose the series of books "Gossip Girl" by Cecily von Ziegesar. I chose this book or series of books because initially my 11 year old daughter wanted to read it. Also, I teach 5th grade and my 5th graders wanted to read it as well. I do think that the series of books is more appropriate for the age level of 9th grade on up even though it is marketed for others.
If I was in charge of a middle school collection I would have it but really watch who checked it out.
Gossip Girl really glamorizes casual relationships, elitism, poor work ethics, and and really just spoiled, bratty rich kids who get the rewards of life without work. Totally the wrong message to send to kids HOWEVER I would not ban it from my center because I do believe in open access.
I do believe that momma's have a say and my daughter won't be reading it.
I would not include the book Blues: For All the Changes by Nikki Giovanni in my collection. I find it racist, unnecessarily bawdy, and vulgar just because she can be. Although several of her subjects are valid, her extreme use of vulgarity outweighs the limited talent she displays. She ain't no Maya Angelou, if you take my point. Kirkus reviews labels her latest poetry a "sad spectacle" and I agree.
ReplyDeleteThe title that I chose to read was Twisted by Laurie Halse Anderson. I would include this book in a high school media center collection and after going back and forth about it, I think I would also include it in a middle school collection. The book is about a teenage boy who is dealing with issues that students would definitely relate to in today's society. The book has been challenged because of sexual content and language. I found myself rooting for the main character, Tyler, even though he has made some bad choices and gotten into trouble. In the end I really enjoyed reading this book.
ReplyDeleteI think that an enormous amount of time could be spent worrying about offending people these days. It seems to me that no matter what you choose, someone will always be offended. I think that as long as there is a solid policy in place and it is followed when decisions are made, offending someone will not be an issue, even if it is unaviodable.
I chose Olive's Ocean by Kevin Henkes and it is banned because of being sexual explicit and inappropriate language. The book is a touching and very sensitive story of a young girl named Martha who, at the start of the book, is informed that her classmate Olive has been killed in a car accident. Martha barely knew Olive, so the rest of the novel explores Martha’s feelings about Olive and her journal entry — and death in general.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the book I wonder why is this book repeatedly challenged? The ALA lists “sexually explicit and offensive language” as the reason, and I knew this as I was reading it for the first time. I was expecting to see a curse words or two, or maybe a discussion of Martha’s newly developing sexual feelings for boys but it wasn't there. None of this was in the novel — I’m guessing the “controversial” element is a two paragraph segment about a quarter the way into the book. In this section we see Martha’s parents kissing and hugging at the breakfast table. Martha’s brother explains this as “MSB” or “Morning Sex Behavior,” saying the parents always act goofy when they have sex in the morning.
Now this is the only even remotely sexual part of this novel. And the behavior occurs between Martha’s parents — a loving couple displaying loving feelings for one another. Perhaps some folks would rather not have the “sex talk” with their 4th or 5th graders (the likely audience for this story), but what a great opportunity they are missing. This book’s brief reference to sex places it firmly in the easiest situation to explain — two parents who are in love! Don’t shy away from this book, you’ll be glad you read it.